The Sound and the Fury • Press
- The New York Times May 21, 2015
- TimeOut New York January 20, 2015
- Entertainment Weekly May 21, 2015
- Theatermania May 21, 2015
- Exeunt Magazine May 21, 2015
- New York Daily News May 22, 2015
- Theater Pizzazz! May 21, 2015
- Huffington Post May 21, 2015
- The Bergen Record May 22, 2015
- The Advertiser March 12, 2010
- The Australian March 15, 2010
- Expresso-Actual January 24, 2009
- Publico January 20, 2009
- The New Yorker May 26, 2008
- The New Yorker May 5, 2008
- The New York Times April 30, 2008
- Time Out New York April 30-May 6, 2008
- Time Out New York April 30, 2008
- The New York Sun April 30, 2008
- The International Herald Tribune April 29, 2008
- Backstage April 29, 2008
- Variety April 29, 2008
- The New York Times April 27, 2008
- Variety November 30, 2007
- The Brooklyn Rail April 2008
- The Village Voice March 4, 2008
- Variety November 30, 2007
‘The Sound and the Fury’ is a confusing yet engrossing Faulkner reboot
By Elisabeth Vincentelli
You could expect “The Sound and the Fury” to be a tedious slog. And yet, strangely, it’s not.
This fearful anticipation comes from the fact that the show is a verbatim staging of the first part of Faulkner’s novel of the same name — which is legendarily hard to get through, with a plotless chronology that jumps all over the place and a confusing stream-of-consciousness structure.
As if this weren’t foreboding enough, different actors play the same person at different times, and there’s no traditional characterization.
Don’t go in expecting to understand everything, and you won’t be disappointed.
Fans of Elevator Repair Service’s “Gatz” — a seven-hour, freak hit adaptation of “The Great Gatsby” — will be similarly excited by the company’s earlier take on Faulkner, which is now being reprised at the Public.
Excerpt from “‘The Sound and the Fury’ is a confusing yet engrossing Faulkner reboot” by Elisabeth Vincentelli. Read the full article here.